Intelligent Universe:

None of the documentaries or articles I have viewed or read so far have mentioned that the universe might be considered sentient or intelligent. 

An argument can be made. Think of it as follows:

–-A variously estimated four and a half billion years ago, an immense hydrogen cloud in an outlying arm of the Milky Way galaxy condensed into a stellar mass large enough to spontaneously ignite. The nuclear furnace of the Sun was lit. 

--The Sun’s gravitational mass drew into its accretion disc elements of interstellar debris generated within short-lived giant stars that preceded it, went nova, blasting into surrounding space all the chemical elements that were fused from hydrogen within their nuclear furnaces. 

--Our solar system of planets and satellites condensed from leftover debris generated by such events, and those elements became the building blocks of the eight planets, more than a hundred satellites and swarms of asteroids in our star system. 

--Conditions friendly to life were created on at least one planet-–Terra. 

--It follows then that the elements generated within giant stars eventually evolved into intelligent life on this planet. We, as intelligent beings, evolved from that matrix of star dust. 

--A universe that evolves intelligent creatures is, by definition, intelligent, that intelligence arising from the ultimate manifestation of the underlying principle of all life–-natural selection--the binary code of evolution.

--As part of that creation, we have to conclude that the universe, in all of its awe-inspiring beauty, is also intelligent and aware of itself, because we, as constituents of it, are having this discussion. 

--When we focus telescopes such as the Hubble on endless star fields, nebulae and galaxies in all of their majestic glory, we are looking at Creation itself, the basic processes that gave life to our species, and that creation is intelligent. If you’re looking for God, you might be inspired at this point to stop and think about it.

--Darwin has explained creation to us and Hubble has shown us pictures of it that surpass anything one might view in the Sistine Chapel or the Dome on the Rock, wonders that drew our eyes toward the heavens before we evolved the technology to actually view them in detail.

Paulo Yaztrzembski:

Nobody in my recollection ever went out of his way to wax poetic about what a nice guy my maternal grandfather, Paulo Yaztrzembski, was. 

I just heard a lot of stories from my uncles and aunts about his strict and demanding ways. It was mostly bellyaches about chores and curfews, the usual stuff that concerns rebellious kids.

Yaztrzembski. That might not be exactly the way his family name translated from the Cyrillic script, but close enough. It was hard to pronounce even for Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles, and many of his neighbours who arrived from eastern Europe roughly about the same time, took the liberty to simply abbreviate it to Yastrob, which translates to Hawk in some of the east European dialects. It was darkly hinted that for some, Yastrob could have been not so much a name as an allusion to his character.

Not that he cared. He came to Canada around the turn of the 20th Century, bringing with him my grandma Anastasia, and a generous measure of the will to succeed. Here was a brand new country with lots of farmland up for grabs and opportunities unavailable to him back in Europe. He was not about to squander the chance to make his private dreams and ambitions into reality here in the new world.

This was the time when MP Clifford Sifton from Manitoba brought to the Canadian parliament’s attention the fact that if we don’t settle the west, the Yanks will soon do it for us on their own terms. Parliament's answer was to get the survey teams going all over the west and offer 160-acre homesteads at $10 to anyone willing to settle and work the soil. 

$10 sounds like not much today, but in the year 1900, it was worth about $150 in today's dollars, so it wasn't small change.

They advertised it in Europe. That brought a wave of would-be land barons from the European countries, Paulo Yaztrzembski among them, steaming across the Atlantic.

He had what it takes. A high-energy personality, he worked hard and thought smart, expecting the same of the people around him. My mother, the eldest of his seven children, was born in a wheat field where her mother was helping with the harvest. Grandma simply wrapped the new baby in her apron and walked home across the stubble field. 

No, he wasn't a cruel SOB or a wife beater. This was the year 1905 in the Eastern reaches of the Saskatchewan prairie and that’s the way time was prioritized if the gardens and crops, representing a full year's work, were to be gathered and stowed safely before the early snowfall.

It did not take grandpa long to acquire as much land as he could cultivate and the farm machinery he needed to cultivate it. As the years went by, he was one of the first among his group of arrivals to own a brand new McLaughlin Buick convertible. His home was wired for electricity and there was a powerful Windcharger out on the hill and large glass batteries in the basement. A steel wind turbine pumped water for the livestock. Everything was high tech for its day.

Contrary to what our young environmentalists think, wind turbines were not invented by Al Gore and David Suzuki. They've been around for a couple of thousand years in one form or another.

All of that happened before the US stock market crash which precipitated the Great Depression back in ‘29. That event put the brakes on the headlong rush to prosperity as credit became scarce or non-existent, but it was not in grandpa’s character to give up. With energy undiminished, he picked up the pieces and set about to rebuild his little empire.

His farming community was centered on a meeting hall they called Pretty View, an aptly named location overlooking the scenic Assiniboine watershed to the south. In time, it became a nest of Communist sympathizers, people who were moved to blame the free market economy in the new world for the stock market crash. 

Having had their plans for a successful life derailed, it did not take much effort for an aspiring Communist party politician to convince the local farmers of the merits of Karl Marx’s Utopian visions as relief from the world of shattered dreams they now lived in.

You’d think an industrious dude like my grandpa would have seen through such propaganda as an economic vision that failed to take human nature into account and, as a result, was destined to fail right from the start. Apparently, he did not. It was one of the straws people clutched at when all they had worked for slipped away from their grasp with US stock market manipulations that had nothing at all to do with farming.

But the political climate had little bearing on how Grandpa’s friends and family regarded him. Mostly, hand-me-down information has it that they saw him as a tough guy who demanded maximum effort from people around him and tolerated no nonsense. While there is no actual evidence that he went around looking for a fight, neither was he especially known to back down from physical violence when he thought the occasion warranted it. 

My own memories of him are those of a serious, not particularly warm, thoughtful personality with a neat handlebar moustache. Clearly, he was a man on a mission, and not the easiest guy to get to know, but he did give me books to read. It was mostly political literature based on communist theory, matters of less than zero concern to my grade school mind. 

My father, whose views on communism differed somewhat from my grandpa’s, kindly offered to file that literature for me, did so, and promptly forgot where. It mattered little, since I never asked.

What inspired grandpa to pick me from among a couple dozen of his grandchildren as the beneficiary for his books still provides me food for thought in my most private moments. Usually, I catch myself wondering if I should feel proud or guilty.

Grandpa died young, before I was in my teens, and before I could actually get to know him on more than a superficial level. The high physical demands he put upon himself were the most probable contributing factor to his early demise. He was laid to rest in the Tolstoy cemetery north of Verigin, SK. Anastasia joined him there about 35 years later. Their joint tombstone is red granite.

Family photos of grandpa show him looking very much like some pictures of Wyatt Earp, the US marshal made famous by the gunfight at the OK Corral. That image was enhanced somewhat by whispered rumours of a six gun in grandpa’s possession. I do not recall any talk of him ever threatening anyone or actually using it, but my childish imagination led me to wonder if by any chance it was a Colt 45 Peacemaker and if he ever wore it in an open leather holster slung low on his right hip.

Tough guy? Sure, why not? Those were tough times. 

But there was another side to this man. My mother liked to recall an incident when she was a little girl playing with her second in line, her younger brother, my uncle John. While playing in the farmyard’s wooded perimeter, Josie and John discovered a red squirrel’s storehouse. It was late fall and they found this hollow tree trunk filled with hazel nuts. 

Bonanza! The annual fall chore of gathering a winter’s supply of hazel nuts to munch on before a warm fire in January took a couple of weeks for an individual to fill a burlap bushel bag. Hazel nuts grew everywhere in the forest underbrush and you had to know where to look. Here was a batch all ready picked. John’s straw hat was not big enough to contain all the nuts and they also filled their pockets, according to my mother. 

They brought their find back to the farmhouse and showed it off proudly to their parents.

“Where did you get those?” asked grandpa.

“We found them in a hollow tree out behind those grain bins,” said my mother.

“You take those nuts and put them right back where you found them,” he scolded. "Those poor squirrels worked hard to put in a supply for the winter. What are they going to eat if you steal their food?”

Thus having received their marching orders, Josie and John went and scooped the nuts right back into the hole in the tree trunk.

Tough guy? Wild West-type character? Maybe. But also, beneath that tough and unyielding exterior, there was a genuine streak of compassion few individuals other than Anastasia, Josie, John and the red squirrels were able to access. 

Grandpa wasn't about to see a hard-working little red rodent suffer the fate he himself was destined to endure about ten years later with the Great American stock market crash. 

(Note: The red squirrel is about half the size of the black and grey squirrels in Toronto.)

Despite all the stories of demands and uncompromising effort, that one incident alone inspires in me feelings on the warm side of ambivalent for my grandpa with the unpronounceable name, Paulo Yaztrzembski.

Gay Pride:

Gay pride?

What’s that all about?

Our sexuality is not an achievement. It’s a condition. It’s something we’re born with, and should include either male or female physical parts. What's there to be proud of?

Apart from the fact that our religious background considers pride a sin, if our sexuality is all we have to be proud of, it’s really not much, is it? 

Upon puberty, most of us become aware that we share our sexual equipment with roughly 50 percent of the people we know, so we are not unique. That being the case, it would be to our own personal benefit and the comfort of everyone within earshot if we resisted the urge to bore everyone around us with the prurient details. 

People tempted to exhibit pride in their sexuality should be reminded that it’s a function they share with all living things, including rodents, house flies, fleas, fruit flies, aphids and head lice. To their credit, they do not make a public production of it.

The pride parade? In Toronto, it’s been an annual freak show hardly fit for family viewing. Incredibly, some people bring their children. Here's our future crop of neurotics. 

The pride parade is an event eagerly promoted by our sensation-mongering media because it enhances their advertising. The breathless publicity and highly inflated crowd counts attest to that.

The rainbow flag? We should hesitate before tarnishing the image of the rainbow by hanging a limp parody of it on a flagpole at city hall. One of Mother Nature’s most spectacular displays deserves more respect than that. 

We all belong to the human spectrum. Comparing the sexually indeterminate end of it to a rainbow is an easily verifiable case of human-generated environmental degradation. 

Al Gore and David Suzuki should have no trouble making their case on this one.

The Abortion Issue

The latest political incursion into what ought to be a private matter comes from Lib leader Justin Trudeau. Young Trudeau is reported to have said he will not accept any candidates who will vote against the right for any woman to abort a pregnancy. As usual, young Trudeau ventures into territory more experienced politicians tend to avoid.

I'm not a politician and am not looking for anyone's approval, so let's discuss abortion.

To put things in perspective, the debate over when life begins in the process of gestation is ridiculous. Life does not begin. It is simply passed on from parents to children via sperm and egg cell as has been the procedure right from its initiation. 

If life began on this planet, then it was initiated hundreds of millions of years ago. If it arrived here on a meteor or a comet, that time span could go into a billion years or more. But none of this stops the pro and con-abortion pressure groups from wringing their hands over it endlessly.

Someone once described pressure groups as a 20th-Century phenomenon that probably reflects too much spare time available for the first time in history to people unequipped to handle it productively. It is now the 21st Century and nothing much has changed. That description is still accurate.

The anti-abortion lobby in particular, has gone so far as to gun down doctors and other activists who describe their stance as “pro-choice”. That’s as in pro-choice for the mother, no choice for the fetus.

Whether or not this wrangling serves the development of our social consciousness in a positive way is difficult to say. However, forcing a woman to go through with a pregnancy who would otherwise terminate it for no better reason than that it would be inconvenient for her to carry it to term probably does the process of evolution a disfavor. 

It is likely that the human gene pool would benefit from the removal of such genetics from it. Why add to the gene pool still another unwanted child with the chance that it will be genetically predisposed to be morally deficient? There are far too many of those around already, including the activists on both sides of that argument.

The people who argue that terminating a pregnancy is murder as well as those who argue that it is not are both only about half right. A fetus is not entirely a human being. It has the potential to become a human being, but even a newborn is nothing more than a freshly-assembled organism possessing only a set of physical attributes and genetic predispositions plus an autonomous system for programming. As yet, there is no specific program (personality) other than that which doting family members project upon it in their overly-stimulated imaginations.

“Oh, he looks like Grandpa Al”; or “Doesn't she have the chubby behind of her Great Aunt May?” Apart from such hopeful comparisons, in actual fact, there is only potential, nothing more. It is a brand new microprocessor that has yet to be programmed. There is little evidence that there is anybody there until a program initiates.

Of course, a fetus at any stage of development is already special, but no more so than that of a rodent or a bird. It represents the success of a solitary sperm, one out of a variously-estimated four to forty million, that made the journey from the male gonads to the female egg cell to achieve, against almost insurmountable odds, the process of fertilization.

This is no mean achievement. It represents an incredible journey with more hazards in it than were faced by any fictional hero in an operatic saga written by Wagner.

When a sperm finds the egg in a couple who want the child, that is good news. When this happens by misadventure through rape or random promiscuity, that is bad news. The probability that the resulting fetus may be carrying the genetics of a mother who does not want it and a father who has had the bad judgement to impregnate a woman who does not want to be pregnant is even worse news.

The fact this happens in a majority of the cases between people whose lives have yet to emerge from the chaotic conditions of social instability and/or who have developed irresponsible attitudes toward the use of drugs and/or alcohol, bodes trouble ahead for the newly-initiated fetus. 

Seeing this fetus to full term practically guarantees a minefield of dubious genetics and damaged tissues and is unlikely to serve either society or the process of human evolution in a positive direction.

Dare we remind the activists who call themselves pro-lifers that for every successful impregnation, in excess of 3,999,999 innocent little happy-face spermatozoa with little propellers flailing away behind perish in the acid secretions and gelatinous sperm traps along the route to the egg? Who represents their cause?

And of an estimated 400 eggs that a woman is destined to produce in the course of her reproductive years, only two or three get to be fertilized on the average. The remainder are unceremoniously flushed out of the system along with the inside layer of the uterus to die one or two at a time at the end of a lunar month period.

These, too, are real, live, human components. Like the sperm, which carries the male genome, the egg carries the spark and the female half of the blueprint of human life. It is the sperm and the egg that are the bearers of life from generation to generation. Who speaks for them? 

It is clear that when you really get down to it, these highly-politicized arguments about when life begins and whether to abort or not to abort can get pretty stupid.

The perennial argument between the liberal media and the Catholic Church about the use of condoms pits a side that wants to do the act without taking the risk against the edicts of a Church that tends to view human life as sacred. Can any religion afford to not view human life as sacred? Every abortion represents one more empty space in the pews come Sunday morning.

The church obviously opts for the way Nature reduces populations--through microbial attack, violence and natural selection, where the weak get eaten and only the most fit survive. It would appear that the church feels everybody should be given the chance to fight it out on their own in the arena of real life instead of ending it before it begins. It is a point worth thinking about, but not for too long.

Of course, that is what religion is for. Its purpose is to set out rules for civilized behavior. What all of these other people lining up pro and con abortion are about is still another mysterious facet of our current state of social consciousness.

Let us blame that on the robots. The household robots do the work while their owners sit around agonizing about things that should really be none of their concern.

Late abortionist Dr. Henry Morgentaler was not a leading-edge social phenomenon. That is what witches were for all along. This was their main stock-in-trade. 

Of course, the nature of their work made them not only essential to every community, but also high-profile targets when they possessed secrets regarding the wives and daughters of local officialdom that would best be left undisclosed. It requires no great stretch of the imagination to perceive what all those witch burnings were about.

Be all that as it may, the decision of whether or not to abort should be made by the woman in consultation with the man who impregnated her. If she’s not too sure of just who did it, or if he has disappeared or declines to take responsibility, then the decision, rightly or wrongly, is hers and hers alone, unless she wants to consult with her parents, priest or counselor. There is no room in such a decision for the involvement of activists, politicians, sidewalk superintendents or third-party busybodies with too much time on their hands.

The couple who decide to pair up and become responsible parents are probably fit to parent the child with a real chance of bringing a significant new life into this world. Those who decide to abort have to live with the guilt for the remainder of their now-tainted lives.

What about Morgentaler? Anyone who stoops to accept the Order of Canada following Dr. Henry Morgentaler’s highly controversial award would gladly accept a medal regardless who offered it and for whatever flimsy reason. People who do not wish to be linked in any way with this event have returned their awards and no doubt there will be many others who decline the offer in the future.

It would not be in the least surprising if some entrepreneurial spirit has already negotiated the striking of a medal even more ostentatious than the Order of Canada with the inscription, “I returned my tainted Order of Canada Medal” and offered it as a trade-up for that now sorry award. They would still have a golden gong to show off, but would be announcing clearly to all concerned that they do not want to be associated with some of the other recipients.

NOTE: Further to how a fetus relates to a finished product: Every wheat seed that is milled into flour for baking is an aborted wheat plant. Every slice of bread represents a couple of thousand aborted baby wheat plants. The same is true of every seed of every plant. Each is a complete fetus that needs only to be exposed to warmth and moisture to germinate. Plant babies such as cherry stones, which are encased in hard shells, are packaged in delicious tissues for birds and animals to eat and soften before they are excreted along with nitrogen-rich nutrients to take root in a location far from the parent plants.

Beer drinkers should be aware that beer is brewed from sprouted barley seeds, well on their way to developing into barley plants. How many thousand barley plant fetuses were aborted to brew a glass of beer?

Eggs are bird fetuses. Anyone who wants to feel guilty about eating plant or animal fetuses should go ahead, but regardless of how we choose to moralize and agonize over it, that is the way the dance of life and death works on this planet. Get used to it.

As for young Trudeau's declaration, he should consider himself lucky his parents decided not to take the option when he was conceived.

Master of the Universe:

Every time I read or hear about how our Ontario School Teachers favor developing self-esteem in their students over teaching them the three Rs I think of my old friend Pete.

The reason Pete immediately comes to mind is because he was one of those kids who had no problem with self-esteem. Far from it. He had it in spades. 

Long ago, when I was in grade school, self-esteem was something you either had or didn't have. Nobody took the time to worry much about it. There were other things to worry about. There was a world war on and winning it was by no means a sure thing. 

You'd think living in the middle of the flat prairie, we'd have been insulated from what was happening away out there in Europe. Not so. Yellow Harvard Trainers from the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan roared overhead. Young men from the neighborhood wore khaki when they came home on leave from the army, and mothers lived in fear of that knock on the door by someone with the dreaded message that their son was missing in action.

Basic necessities like new vehicles, gasoline, rubber tires, liquor and butter were hard to get because of the tonnage of materials destined for the British Isles that was being sent to the bottom of the Atlantic almost daily by Nazi U-boats.

What we kids missed most of all was chocolate bars with real chocolate and peanuts instead of some half-baked soybeans or other barely edible fillers.

The news was full of heroics on those rare times early in the war when something positive was achieved by allied forces. One such occasion that comes to mind was the see/saw battle when Montgomery finally chased Rommel out of North Africa.  

Besides being fed a daily diet of heroic propaganda from the battle fronts, we school kids got our dose of it from sources more appropriate to our age group. The comic magazines (10 cents) were full of it. Of course, we were being programmed to join in as soon as we were old enough, and we could hardly wait to get out there and join in The Great Adventure.

So we had our heroes and our villains. Besides airmen, soldiers and sailors bravely strutting their stuff, the heroes included Superman, Captain Marvel (SHAZAM!) Batman and Robin. Of course, we found the time to discuss and even argue the relative merits of what comic heroes we would most like to be. They allowed us to stretch our imaginations beyond the bounds of our less than heroic daily lives.

But not Pete. No ordinary heroes with extraordinary superpowers for him. True to form, his fantasy had to be just a little more fantastic than anyone else's. He would settle for nothing less than Master of the Universe.

Most of the kids in our multi-grade country schoolhouse found Pete's level of self-esteem a bit hard to deal with on a conversational level, and bailed out of any chance of close camaraderie with him. But I had little choice. His family farm yard was along my way to school and he waited for me to come by in the mornings, so I was his buddy by chance, if not exactly by choice.

So, on the days when the weather was dry and the dirt roads navigable by bicycle, it was okay, but on those muddy morns when we wore raincoats and boots and had to walk, making productive conversation was a bit of a chore. Somehow, with Pete, all discussions tended to become arguments.

Pete was not a dumb kid. Far from it. He displayed very real skills around things mechanical and structural around farm machinery and buildings. His bike was always serviceable and in good repair. 

It was school work that was his Achilles heel. Like many bright kids, especially among the young males, he found just sitting there trying to absorb droning lessons a real drag when he could have been elsewhere, doing something real, something meaningful. His mind had the tendency to escape to explore more fertile ground within his imagination. It is possible that most of us can identify with that one.

He was still in grade school when one day he decided he'd had enough. He announced that he would go out and get a job and make a shipload of money before the rest of us were even out of school. He decided that he would pursue his fortune in Winnipeg, so getting there was his short-term goal.

Besides having high self-esteem, Pete was also resourceful. He set up a proper trap line in the winter and harvested enough ermine, river otter, beaver and muskrat furs to finance his expedition to the Big City.

He found work in Winnipeg, which was not difficult in the immediate post-war era when a hungry world bombed into the stone age needed all the goods it could get. This meant all the goodies a country like Canada that survived the war with infrastructure intact was able to deliver. 

All of Hitler's U-boats were now safely on the bottom of the Atlantic among all that cargo they had sunk early in the war. Now it was possible for all food and supplies for the hungry and tattered survivors to make it safely all the way to the other side. 

In the years that followed, Pete came home from time to time to visit his family. He drove modern cars, mostly with more horsepower than ordinary mortals would require. He dressed well, but no ship load of money was in evidence. He might have been banking it, but no one took the chance to ask.

Then, one year he came home with his new bride, a tall, easy-on-the-eyes blonde with a strong foreign accent. That marked her as a Displaced Person, obviously a survivor of the war in Europe. 

Those of us who knew Pete figured that this well-constructed woman, who appeared to have no problem with his overwhelming self-esteem, was probably from Germany where, over the years, they had been conditioned to tolerate jackboot diplomacy.

It was a good time to set up farming on the prairie frontier, and that's what they did. Soon, they began raising grain, farm animals and family. 

As the years went by, they became parents to six beautiful children, who, at the early growth stages before they entered their teens, no doubt regarded their parents as heroic, all-knowing, God-like beings.

They set their farmyard well back from the grid road where Pete could enjoy a bit of privacy and insulate himself from the pointless blatherings of lesser mortals. His wife appeared happy just to be alive and well living in a peaceful country setting with her family.

Presumably, Pete obeyed traffic rules, paid off his debts and his taxes on time. It should have been easy for anyone interested to conclude that here, at last, he had indeed become master of his own little universe.

Secularism Vs Religion:

Every time the media reports still another eruption of violence from the religious lunatic fringe, activists in the chaotic end of our social spectrum renew their vows to ban religions all together in favor of a purely secular society. They proceed to remove crosses from public institutions and demand an end to prayers.

This works for them because they are too ill informed or too young to remember Adolph Hitler's or Joseph Stalin's purely secular societies. It seems that schools today either don't teach history or the kids write it off in their minds as something of interest only to dead people or those about to die.

History of what happened in Hitler's Germany is everywhere, both in print as well as black-and-white film. It's not as though this information is unavailable.

Hitler's secular society slaughtered anyone who didn't measure up, and when they ran out of mental or physical cripples and the sexually indeterminate, they went after the Jews. 

Then they set out to enslave the Russian people after stealing their living space.

Of course, Stalin had his own secular agenda which made life quite hazardous for anyone who failed to show boundless enthusiasm for his brand of communism. There are entire highways in Siberia actually built on the bones of forced labor consisting of people who did not measure up. It is estimated that Stalin killed more Soviets than Hitler's invading legions.

It would be reckless for us to take for granted that the people who favor a purely secular society over one that includes religion understand what religion is and how it differs from secularism.

Of course, the opinions of these pro-active rabble-rousers are no doubt severely skewed by the antics of the Islamic lunatic fringe which our electronic media glorifies in gory detail in order to hold our attention for their advertisers.

There is little doubt that religion's main function, right from the beginning, was to promote a means for people to know the difference between what kind of behavior is acceptable within the community and what is not. The Ten Commandments attributed to Moses sums it up nicely. That was a good start.

When viewed in the cold light of reality, secularism shows little interest in what's right and what's wrong. It simply makes laws, rules and regulations and devises an extensive array of punishments for people who are caught breaking those laws.

Legal coercion quickly becomes the norm in a secular society and as time goes on, fewer and fewer decisions are left up to individual discretion. Less and less, we are expected to know what to do right. More and more, we are told what to do by the politicians who miss no opportunities to do things they think will get them elected.


In a secular society, priests and churches are replaced by judges, courthouses, police stations, prisons and penitentiaries to house all those people who disobey the laws. In Germany, the Nazis set up slave labor camps. The Soviets set up Gulags in Siberia. 

People living in a secular society break the laws because, with no religions, there are few effective provisions to program them for socially acceptable behavior. 

As the secular society ages, the legal system more and more tends to protect lawbreakers instead of their victims because law enforcement tends to become an industry and that's their bread and butter. 

This requires no research. Just look around you and take note of what's happening here.

Most of those lenient judges really aren't as inept as their sentencing records would lead us to believe. It could be they are simply buying insurance against future unemployment for themselves. On the other hand, they can be busily enhancing the importance of their jobs. Some of them are not even aware they are doing that. It's all cleverly written into legal procedures. 

That is how the father of a five-year-old gets arrested and strip searched when the child is reported to have scrawled a crayon version of a firearm on a scrap of paper in kindergarten. Everyone involved, from the neurotic teacher who allowed her imagination to cloud reality, to the unimaginative principal who did not hesitate to call the cops, to the cops playing heroic Swat Team games who jumped the father, to their superiors who defended this exercise in idiocy. 

Superiors? Hardly. They were probably promoted not because of their qualifications as police officers, but because they were either bilingual, or of the right sex, sexual inclinations, skin color or ethnic origins. 

It's all sanctioned under Trudeau's famous Charter of Rights legislation.

All hiring these days is done with the Human Rights tribunals looking over your shoulder. Actual qualifications tend to be pushed aside until those other conditions are met.

In the kindergarten dangerous weapons case, all the guilty parties involved claimed they were simply following procedure. 

See how easy it is? Nobody is responsible. It's all procedure.

That is quite close to what happened during the flooding in High River Alberta where our famous Royal Canadian Mounted Police kicked in doors of every private residence to get at the guns inside. Severely teed-off citizens are still looking for the guilty parties--the officials who ordered this abuse of democratic principles. What the RCMP did there would not have been out of place in Hitler's Nazi Germany. Last we heard, these citizens are still being stonewalled as the guilty parties pass the buck around like a hot potato.

That's the kind of thing that goes on in a society that is headed toward a purely secular system which favors political control and the guilty politicians scramble to insulate themselves from the anger of the citizenry.

Just remember: when a judge sentences a criminal to life in prison, what is actually happening there is he is sentencing the taxpayers to feed, clothe, shelter, and entertain this marginal human in a good state of health for that length of time. In many cases, they even supply him with conjugal visits with wife, girl friend or interested parties.

The criminal can take early retirement. It's easy. All he needs to do is go out and kill someone, get arrested and plead guilty.

Who is being punished here, the criminal, or the taxpayer? 

And is this okay with the people who would do away with religion in favor of a strictly secular society?

Here comes Christmas:

As our annual orbit of the sun approaches winter solstice, we in the Christian world celebrate the occasion as Christmas. But not without the usual griping from unhappy members of the progressive (chaotic) end of our social spectrum. They would like to do away with the festival all together.

We don't hear much about these self-appointed apologists for the Christian world this year, probably because members of our Toronto media are busy piling on mayor Rob Ford. The wild typhoon in the Philippines helped a little, too.

But back to Christmas. Christmas comes to us from early Christian strategists who thought it was a good idea to attach this festival to the traditional seasonal celebration of the Return of the Sun. Instead of sacrificing virgins, burning towering wooden effigies filled with assorted criminals, our ancestors had their wild partying toned down by Christian activists to make it more suitable for a civilized society.

In time, it became normal to celebrate the occasion by exchanging gifts, practicing good will and tolerance, feasting, indulging in holiday spirits and doing our best to behave and be nice. We do all this to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, who was offered as the ultimate role model for how all good Christians ought to behave.

It doesn't really matter when Jesus Christ was born. Dec. 25 is when we celebrate his birthday. It's all part of a purpose, and the purpose is a good one. It focuses our behavior on a peaceful community, and that is what religion should be all about, should it not? 

That is why, instead of picking fault, we should defend the celebration of Christmas. It really is about peace and good will. We should all look forward to Christmas as a festival where we can briefly forget about the bumps in our personal pathways through life and concentrate on getting together with family and friends for a bit of holiday cheer, good food and good will. That is far more important than the gifts and the holiday glitz, but those are an important part of this festival as well.

There's nothing wrong with giving and receiving things we want or need. Christmas mythology says that practice was started by the three wise men presenting their gifts to the baby Jesus. It was perpetuated by an early Saint Nicholas who is alleged to have slipped gold coins into the footwear of girls in needy families to fatten up their dowries. Apparently, back then, it wasn't easy to marry off daughters without a bribe.

In today's social consciousness, an old guy slipping coins to young girls in the night would probably be seen as a potential child molester and be taken to task by some politically-appointed human rights tribunal. Still, Nicholas was seen as a saint with ideas beneficial to the community in the silly old social consciousness of the early Christian era.

The business of giving was reinforced in an insightful story by Charles Dickens about an old miser who valued wealth above all else. It was further enhanced in America in a nicely crafted poem about a fat little elf arriving in a miniature sleigh towed by eight tiny reindeer and descending down a chimney with a bag full of goodies for the children. 

Of course, today's Santa Claus is no longer a fat little elf catering to small people. Like almost everyone else on this continent, he has grown to enormous proportions.

Instead of celebrating this aspect of the holiday as an opportunity to show people we love and care for that we love them and care for them, the people in our society who appear to harbor very limited capacity for peace and good will dismiss it all as nothing more than a commercial operation propelled by greed.

It is that, too, but is that so bad? Thousands of Ma and Pa businesses everywhere in the Christian world survive only because someone out there buys their goodies at Christmas time. Without that, they would have to fold and probably go on the dole. Millions of people are kept employed manufacturing things we don't necessarily need, but which we buy anyway on this occasion.

Without Christmas, about 80 percent of the Arts and Crafts industry would be wiped out and the chocolate supply network would undergo massive layoffs. Thriving evergreen tree farms and poinsettia nurseries would go out of business.

Giving the people in the northern hemisphere where it all began something to anticipate at the onset of the darkest days of the year indicates a clear grasp of the vagaries of human nature by the early Christian spin doctors. Instead of reducing our activities to cower in our hovels near the fire behind shuttered windows as the days grow progressively shorter, colder and darker, the Christian take on the festival of the winter solstice gives us something to look forward to.

Lighting candles and stringing up lights everywhere gives participants the feeling that they are actually doing something to ward off the gathering gloom. Symbolically, it provides the opportunity for us to dispel the onset of darkness by lighting a small candle or a string of lights. 

We do not know for sure if this is where the sage advice, "Rather than curse the dark, light a small candle" came from, but there should be no surprise if it did.