Parliament Hill appears uncomfortable with what's being said about them on social media. It seems what's said there is viewed as highly uncomplimentary.
Is this the first time our leaders find themselves being confronted with what the people who elected them actually think?
Were they not exposed to public sentiment through the mainstream media (free press) over the years? What's the difference?
Is it easier for people to complain about their leadership on social media than in person?
Could be the difference between mainsteam and social media is that social media is not for sale. Few people appear to be holding back for fear that they will lose favour with advertisers and politicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment