The US media is beginning to probe their system of education and it is not very inspiring. Apparently, academic success can be bought if you have enough money, political influence, or just the right connections.
This could show us where all those scientists who support global warming and human-induced climate change for the United Nations propaganda mills come from.
Followers
Followers
Saturday, 23 March 2019
Saturday, 16 March 2019
Incompetence? Whose?
That SNC Lavalin media panic smacks of something other than simply a judicial foul-up.
There has to be something more behind it that the Liberals think the people who elected them are too stupid, or too stoned, to understand.
All the media is clamoring for more juicy accusations from Wilson-Raybould. It is possible she has said enough.
Now we should put the PM on the stand and ask him to tell the whole truth. Why was she relieved of her post with the ministry of Justice? Is it possible that she couldn't handle it?
Is it possible that in making his ministry appointments sexually balanced by loading his caucus with women rather than people with actual qualifications, young Trudeau blew it?
If the SNC-Lavalin issue really is about employment, why now? Why not the pipelines and the Oil Sands? Doesn't the area west of Ontario belong to Canada too?
What's the problem? Not enough votes there?
Time for Trudeau to take the stand.
There has to be something more behind it that the Liberals think the people who elected them are too stupid, or too stoned, to understand.
All the media is clamoring for more juicy accusations from Wilson-Raybould. It is possible she has said enough.
Now we should put the PM on the stand and ask him to tell the whole truth. Why was she relieved of her post with the ministry of Justice? Is it possible that she couldn't handle it?
Is it possible that in making his ministry appointments sexually balanced by loading his caucus with women rather than people with actual qualifications, young Trudeau blew it?
If the SNC-Lavalin issue really is about employment, why now? Why not the pipelines and the Oil Sands? Doesn't the area west of Ontario belong to Canada too?
What's the problem? Not enough votes there?
Time for Trudeau to take the stand.
Monday, 4 March 2019
World Saviours:
What's the connection between the green energy events that put the cost of hydro out of reach for many Ontarians and the carbon tax that threatens to do the same for all Canadians?
That connection appears to be Gerald Butts. He is said to have teamed with Liberal leader Dalton McGinty when they bombed coal-fired power plants like Lakeview Hydro in Ontario, and with Justin Trudeau when they dumped a carbon tax on all commercial activity in Canada.
Having butted out of the picture over the SNC-Lavalin scandal, Butts abandoned his accomplice back on parliament Hill to fend for himself.
So, where does this green energy warrior come from? Is it possible that he might be a disciple of that late, great green energy guru Maurice Strong?
For those who do not remember Maurice Strong, he was a fellow westerner who made his way from the Oil Patch east and into the corridors of power with the Liberals of the Chretien era. He used that as a springboard to infiltrate the United Nations corridors in New York. There, he was in the position to bend sympathetic ears on the business of saving the planet. He used that to launch save-the-planet campaigns.
Inexplicably, he migrated to China, the country that probably showed the least interest in green initiatives and save-the-planet campaigns.
Whether it was the smog from extensive coal-fired hydro or severe ideological clash that ended his career, Strong expired there quietly back in 2015.
Whether Strong had any real influence in creating the green energy zealots currently making life in Canada more oppressive and more expensive for everyone, it is up to the individual reader to connect the dots in any way they see fit.
Note: Anyone who wants to refresh one's memory of the life and times of Maurice Strong might Google the name.
Warning: Do not trust everything you read there. Some of it reads like the conspiracy theories of the Flat Earth Society, but it should help us understand where guys like Justin Trudeau and Gerald Butts come from.
That connection appears to be Gerald Butts. He is said to have teamed with Liberal leader Dalton McGinty when they bombed coal-fired power plants like Lakeview Hydro in Ontario, and with Justin Trudeau when they dumped a carbon tax on all commercial activity in Canada.
Having butted out of the picture over the SNC-Lavalin scandal, Butts abandoned his accomplice back on parliament Hill to fend for himself.
So, where does this green energy warrior come from? Is it possible that he might be a disciple of that late, great green energy guru Maurice Strong?
For those who do not remember Maurice Strong, he was a fellow westerner who made his way from the Oil Patch east and into the corridors of power with the Liberals of the Chretien era. He used that as a springboard to infiltrate the United Nations corridors in New York. There, he was in the position to bend sympathetic ears on the business of saving the planet. He used that to launch save-the-planet campaigns.
Inexplicably, he migrated to China, the country that probably showed the least interest in green initiatives and save-the-planet campaigns.
Whether it was the smog from extensive coal-fired hydro or severe ideological clash that ended his career, Strong expired there quietly back in 2015.
Whether Strong had any real influence in creating the green energy zealots currently making life in Canada more oppressive and more expensive for everyone, it is up to the individual reader to connect the dots in any way they see fit.
Note: Anyone who wants to refresh one's memory of the life and times of Maurice Strong might Google the name.
Warning: Do not trust everything you read there. Some of it reads like the conspiracy theories of the Flat Earth Society, but it should help us understand where guys like Justin Trudeau and Gerald Butts come from.
Tuesday, 19 February 2019
Credit Cards:
Banks spend a lot of money these days promoting their credit cards to young people.
What's the most important thing parents should tell their kids about credit cards?
It should be the fact that a credit card allows them to spend money they don't have.
That money belongs to the bank that issues the credit card and the deal is that if they do not repay the card promptly, the bank will charge them interest that can go as high as 25% or more.
When they issue a credit card, the bank is not doing anyone a favour. They're in the business of making money by issuing credit. What they are hoping to do is suck in the credit card holder to buy more than they can pay back, thus getting in deeper and deeper until they have to pay interest not only on the money they borrowed, but also on the interest they failed to pay back.
Credit cards are dangerous in the hands of kids or young adults because when they want something, they have to have it NOW. Not tomorrow, not next week. They can't wait until they have put away enough money to pay for whatever they just can't do without.
It is up to individual parents to figure out how to deliver this message to their offspring, but this should be a priority.
Also, is it being taught in schools? If our progressive teachers' unions think sex indoctrination is important in this rapidly-changing society, they should not ignore the importance of smart money handling.
And that should include being made aware of how not to get sucked in by the easy credit being promoted by the financial institutions.
That business of what's your score? is clearly aimed at kids with cell phones.
What's the most important thing parents should tell their kids about credit cards?
It should be the fact that a credit card allows them to spend money they don't have.
That money belongs to the bank that issues the credit card and the deal is that if they do not repay the card promptly, the bank will charge them interest that can go as high as 25% or more.
When they issue a credit card, the bank is not doing anyone a favour. They're in the business of making money by issuing credit. What they are hoping to do is suck in the credit card holder to buy more than they can pay back, thus getting in deeper and deeper until they have to pay interest not only on the money they borrowed, but also on the interest they failed to pay back.
Credit cards are dangerous in the hands of kids or young adults because when they want something, they have to have it NOW. Not tomorrow, not next week. They can't wait until they have put away enough money to pay for whatever they just can't do without.
It is up to individual parents to figure out how to deliver this message to their offspring, but this should be a priority.
Also, is it being taught in schools? If our progressive teachers' unions think sex indoctrination is important in this rapidly-changing society, they should not ignore the importance of smart money handling.
And that should include being made aware of how not to get sucked in by the easy credit being promoted by the financial institutions.
That business of what's your score? is clearly aimed at kids with cell phones.
Saturday, 16 February 2019
Post-National??
It seems our painfully progressive politicians on Parliament Hill have decided that we are in a new era--that of the post-national society.
I guess that means no more national distinctions. No more identifying as Canadians, Americans, Mexicans, or anything else.
They are now ready, along with the United Nations, to declare a homogenized species--nothing to distinguish anyone from anyone else. No more differences of opinion. No more skin color. We are to see each other not as white or black, only grey. All the employed should be willing, nay, eager to give up a portion of what they earn to keep the idle classes afloat. Even gender is up for grabs.
Now, where have we heard something like that before? Could it be the principle of "....from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"?
If that sounds like Karl Marx, it's because that's who published it first. Marx's great brainstorm was to have the productive segment of society support the unproductive, no questions asked.
It didn't work in the Soviet Union. It didn't work in Cuba and it worked in China only after they gave up and introduced a more-or-less free market economy.
Darwin's theory to the effect that individual initiative is the way all life on this planet has been designed to evolve is correct. That includes humans. Anything else is simply an attempt by unimaginative politicians and immature ideologues to try to mold society to their own specifications.
Any way you want to look at it, the much- ballyhooed post-national society is guaranteed to eventually turn out to be a post-rational society.
It's not a theory. All we need do is have another look at the historic evidence.
I guess that means no more national distinctions. No more identifying as Canadians, Americans, Mexicans, or anything else.
They are now ready, along with the United Nations, to declare a homogenized species--nothing to distinguish anyone from anyone else. No more differences of opinion. No more skin color. We are to see each other not as white or black, only grey. All the employed should be willing, nay, eager to give up a portion of what they earn to keep the idle classes afloat. Even gender is up for grabs.
Now, where have we heard something like that before? Could it be the principle of "....from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"?
If that sounds like Karl Marx, it's because that's who published it first. Marx's great brainstorm was to have the productive segment of society support the unproductive, no questions asked.
It didn't work in the Soviet Union. It didn't work in Cuba and it worked in China only after they gave up and introduced a more-or-less free market economy.
Darwin's theory to the effect that individual initiative is the way all life on this planet has been designed to evolve is correct. That includes humans. Anything else is simply an attempt by unimaginative politicians and immature ideologues to try to mold society to their own specifications.
Any way you want to look at it, the much- ballyhooed post-national society is guaranteed to eventually turn out to be a post-rational society.
It's not a theory. All we need do is have another look at the historic evidence.
Tuesday, 12 February 2019
Saving the Planet:
Apparently, there are 15 coal-fired electrical utilities still functioning here in Canada.
These are power generating plants that have so far escaped being bombed by Save the Planet green energy warriors. Ontario's Dalton McGinty made a production of destroying Lakeview Hydro back when he led the recently de-activated Ontario Liberals.
It is uncertain if this is why he was awarded Ottawa's Key to the City by its admiring mayor recently, but it would be unsafe to bet otherwise.
How does Canada's situation stack up against the on-going efforts of the Global Warming and Climate Change arm of the United Nations? Well, here is a sample of the concern of the international community according to stats.
Statistics show that the European Union has 468 coal fired electric utilities and has slated for production 27 more.
Turkey has 56 coal-fired plants and is planning to launch 93 more.
South Africa has 79 and is building an additional 24.
India has 589 such plants in operation and is committed to add another 446.
The Philippines have 19 coal-fired plants and are building 60 more.
South Korea has 58 such plants and is building an additional 26.
Japan has 90 such plants and is building 45 more.
China has 2,363 coal-fired plants and is building 1,171 more.
So, in total, there are 5,615 coal fired hydro utilities in operation and scheduled to be built around the planet according to the survey. And our heroes on Parliament Hill think they can save the planet by destroying the 15 surviving plants we have in Canada, probably the coldest and most needy of electricity of the lot listed above.
It should also be pointed out that the remaining coal-fired utilities in Canada are mostly located in the flat lands of the Prairie provinces where mountainous terrain suitable for water power is almost non-existent and coal is plentiful.
Is it fair for us to expect the United Nations to pressure the Nobel Committee to hand our gang on Parliament Hill in Ottawa a Save our Earth award?
Note: Numbers posted above do not include existing and projected coal fired plants in the US and Russia, which should be significant.
Monday, 21 January 2019
Alcohol:
Somebody once said something to the effect that those who pay no attention to history are bound to repeat it.
It's happening as we speak. While American Carrie Nation, who took an axe to any bar that sold alcohol in any form in the first half of the 20th Century has long ago expired, her disciples in the form of Mothers Against Drunk Driving here in Canada are busily preaching doom in the early part of Century 21.
We all know how Nation's efforts brought about Prohibition, which brought about smuggling, bootlegging, fuelled the rise of countless mafias and other illegal enterprises, many of which are still in operation as underground economies.
While complicit politicians in the US made the sale of alcohol illegal, in no way did it curtail its use. It just went underground.
Publicity-hungry politicians in the early part of the 21st Century are once again giving in to the persistent campaigning of the MADD organizers, sneaking more oppression into the lives of Canadians. No prohibition yet, but already idle cops with no imagination are going about counting empties being delivered back to the liquor stores.
It happened in Streetsville, a community in Mississauga on the western end of Toronto's Golden Horseshoe. A retired postal worker was grabbed by a cop for returning to the local liquor store a couple of cases of beer bottles consumed over the Christmas holidays.
There was little trouble with alcohol in the horse and buggy days. If the driver paid too little attention to how much he drank in the course of an evening, the horse usually had enough sense to take him home with little prompting.
Cars were another matter. They required that the driver remain conscious of what was happening. That fact probably helped make Carrie Nation's actions seem sane in the early era of automobile travel.
Eighty years later, we're still wrestling with that one. We're still grumbling about alcohol even though technology and whacko tobacco have become more distracting and more dangerous than alcohol in the hands of suicidal drivers or semi-conscious pedestrians.
It is unlikely attitudes regarding the use of alcohol are about to change. Ethanol is too much a part of our existence. It's been with us from the beginning and is a vital part of our evolution.
Those who want to see how, can Google Marula Fruit, an African treat that all the animals love to eat, especially when it ripens and falls to the earth, where it begins to ferment. The animals--everything from baboons to elephants--love it, gorge on it, and stagger around drunkenly.
There can be no doubt at all that early humans were right in there munching on Marula Fruit right along with the monkeys and baboons.
And those humans who were forced to leave the Marula trees behind when they migrated to Europe and Asia found they can get hammered by fermenting other things, such as barley, wheat, grapes, sugar cane, potatoes, and even turnips.
While alcohol is probably not an essential component of successful human development, there is little doubt that it contributed.
How? Well, to begin with, it is a very effective truth serum. Many of our brightest artists, writers and decision makers were not shy about its use. For proof, all we need do is compare civilizations that are not stingy with their consumption of alcohol with those that forbid its use.
Think vodka, a favorite of the Russian cultures, scotch, a favorite of the Scots, beer of the Brits and Germans, bourbon of the Americans, wine of the French and Italians, and rye of the Canadians.
Did alcohol figure prominently in commercial deal making? It must have. Something special was at work when you compare cultures of technological and commercial success with those of third-world inertia.
We regard alcoholics with prominent blood vessels in their noses as hopeless addicts, without noticing that they also sport a luxuriant thatch that is about five times as dense as the hair follicles on individuals of equal age who do not imbibe. Is it due to the expanded circulation in the epidermis that discolors the skin of the schnozz?
Let us hope this discussion prompts no run on liquor stores by bald men determined to grow hair on their heads. Further, if the suppliers of alleged hair stimulants have not already figured a way to employ ethanol in their hair growth potions other than drinking it, I want a share of the action.
It's happening as we speak. While American Carrie Nation, who took an axe to any bar that sold alcohol in any form in the first half of the 20th Century has long ago expired, her disciples in the form of Mothers Against Drunk Driving here in Canada are busily preaching doom in the early part of Century 21.
We all know how Nation's efforts brought about Prohibition, which brought about smuggling, bootlegging, fuelled the rise of countless mafias and other illegal enterprises, many of which are still in operation as underground economies.
While complicit politicians in the US made the sale of alcohol illegal, in no way did it curtail its use. It just went underground.
Publicity-hungry politicians in the early part of the 21st Century are once again giving in to the persistent campaigning of the MADD organizers, sneaking more oppression into the lives of Canadians. No prohibition yet, but already idle cops with no imagination are going about counting empties being delivered back to the liquor stores.
It happened in Streetsville, a community in Mississauga on the western end of Toronto's Golden Horseshoe. A retired postal worker was grabbed by a cop for returning to the local liquor store a couple of cases of beer bottles consumed over the Christmas holidays.
There was little trouble with alcohol in the horse and buggy days. If the driver paid too little attention to how much he drank in the course of an evening, the horse usually had enough sense to take him home with little prompting.
Cars were another matter. They required that the driver remain conscious of what was happening. That fact probably helped make Carrie Nation's actions seem sane in the early era of automobile travel.
Eighty years later, we're still wrestling with that one. We're still grumbling about alcohol even though technology and whacko tobacco have become more distracting and more dangerous than alcohol in the hands of suicidal drivers or semi-conscious pedestrians.
It is unlikely attitudes regarding the use of alcohol are about to change. Ethanol is too much a part of our existence. It's been with us from the beginning and is a vital part of our evolution.
Those who want to see how, can Google Marula Fruit, an African treat that all the animals love to eat, especially when it ripens and falls to the earth, where it begins to ferment. The animals--everything from baboons to elephants--love it, gorge on it, and stagger around drunkenly.
There can be no doubt at all that early humans were right in there munching on Marula Fruit right along with the monkeys and baboons.
And those humans who were forced to leave the Marula trees behind when they migrated to Europe and Asia found they can get hammered by fermenting other things, such as barley, wheat, grapes, sugar cane, potatoes, and even turnips.
While alcohol is probably not an essential component of successful human development, there is little doubt that it contributed.
How? Well, to begin with, it is a very effective truth serum. Many of our brightest artists, writers and decision makers were not shy about its use. For proof, all we need do is compare civilizations that are not stingy with their consumption of alcohol with those that forbid its use.
Think vodka, a favorite of the Russian cultures, scotch, a favorite of the Scots, beer of the Brits and Germans, bourbon of the Americans, wine of the French and Italians, and rye of the Canadians.
Did alcohol figure prominently in commercial deal making? It must have. Something special was at work when you compare cultures of technological and commercial success with those of third-world inertia.
We regard alcoholics with prominent blood vessels in their noses as hopeless addicts, without noticing that they also sport a luxuriant thatch that is about five times as dense as the hair follicles on individuals of equal age who do not imbibe. Is it due to the expanded circulation in the epidermis that discolors the skin of the schnozz?
Let us hope this discussion prompts no run on liquor stores by bald men determined to grow hair on their heads. Further, if the suppliers of alleged hair stimulants have not already figured a way to employ ethanol in their hair growth potions other than drinking it, I want a share of the action.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)